Source |
Greece
played the first match against Colombia in Belo Horizonte which was quite cool
compared to other Brazilian cities of the same latitude. The 852 metres elevation of Belo Horizonte keeps the city cool, suppressing
high maximum air temperatures experienced in nearby cities at lower altitudes. Colombia, not only had a great team but they
are also quite accustomed to the Tierra caliente climate. Greece traveled 1243
kms (as the crow flies) to go from Aracaju to Belo Horizonte while Colombia travelled only 755 kms
from their base camp in Sao Paulo.
Source |
Japan, that
was on the same group, chose to stay in Sao Paulo, where the climate is much
cooler and there is also a big Japanese community. In their second game against
Greece they had to travel 2322 Kms to Natal while Greece had to travel just 605
Kms. The climate in Natal is quite warm at humid during June and July and while
Greece was playing with 10 players for more than half the game, they seemed
more energetic and managed to get a valuable 0-0 draw that proved to be
critical for Greece to advance to the next round.
Ivory Coast
was the fourth team in the group and they chose to stay in Sao Paulo as well.
That meant that along with Japan they traveled the most kms between their camp
and the host cities for the group matches. Ivory Coast traveled 6670 Kms and
Japan 7172 kms. That is more than twice the distance that Greece (3152 kms) or
Colombia (3338 kms) had to travel. The last and crucial match for Ivory Coast
against Greece was played in Fortaleza at 17:00 local time. Greece traveled 816
Kms from Aracaju while Ivory Coast traveled almost three times more (2370).
While the African players were considered superior in strength and speed,
Greece managed to be competitive all the way till the last minute and scored
the winning goal that allowed them to go through to the stage of 16.
Source |
My
conclusion for this group was that team logistics played some role here too.
Greece benefited from their base camp choice while Japan and Ivory Coast did
not, in fact they probably were hindered.
Other
notable failures in this world cup were Italy and the USA team. USA traveled the most kms of all 32 teams (8886) while Italy was close with 8458 kms.
Source |
While I was
never a fan of the German team, it’s only fair to close this blog post with
their accomplishment in this last Mundial. They were the most prepared and organized
team in this competition, not only from an athletic point of view but also for
the team logistics. They picked a relatively north location in Bahia and
arranged for a fit for purpose, newly built just for them, base camp. Campo Bahia a new resort constructed at an area
with a climate similar to those where the team’s matches were played, included 14 two-storey housing units, a training pitch, team
headquarters, and a fitness center. It has been reported that a German investor has helped to fund the £25 million project. Germany was one of the top
five teams with the less kms traveled (fourth with just 2114) at the Group
stage. Interestingly Argentina that also made it to the World Cup final was
third with just 2086 kms.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete