World cup team logistics. Flights and heat in Brazil part 2 and final.

The first part of this blog post, was about the Soccerroo’s choice for a base camp in Brazil and how that did not have a negative effect in the team’s performance, something that can be suggested though for Spain.  

Source

Greece participated in a football World Cup for the third time in its history. This time, people responsible for organizing the team’s logistics were more professional and prepared than they were back in 1994 in USA when Greece first participated in a world cup. For the base camp, the coach and his associates picked Aracaju the capital of Sergipe.  This was the second most northern base camp of all participating teams. Only Ghana chose to stay at a city further north, in Maceio. Aracaju a seaside Brazilian city, is known as the city with the healthiest lifestyle in the country and a national example for its bike paths. During the world cup, it was hot and very humid.

Greece played the first match against Colombia in Belo Horizonte which was quite cool compared to other Brazilian cities of the same latitude. The 852 metres elevation of Belo Horizonte keeps the city cool, suppressing high maximum air temperatures experienced in nearby cities at lower altitudes.  Colombia, not only had a great team but they are also quite accustomed to the Tierra caliente climate. Greece traveled 1243 kms (as the crow flies) to go from Aracaju to Belo Horizonte while Colombia travelled only 755 kms from their base camp in Sao Paulo. 

Source

Japan, that was on the same group, chose to stay in Sao Paulo, where the climate is much cooler and there is also a big Japanese community. In their second game against Greece they had to travel 2322 Kms to Natal while Greece had to travel just 605 Kms. The climate in Natal is quite warm at humid during June and July and while Greece was playing with 10 players for more than half the game, they seemed more energetic and managed to get a valuable 0-0 draw that proved to be critical for Greece to advance to the next round.   

Ivory Coast was the fourth team in the group and they chose to stay in Sao Paulo as well. That meant that along with Japan they traveled the most kms between their camp and the host cities for the group matches. Ivory Coast traveled 6670 Kms and Japan 7172 kms. That is more than twice the distance that Greece (3152 kms) or Colombia (3338 kms) had to travel. The last and crucial match for Ivory Coast against Greece was played in Fortaleza at 17:00 local time. Greece traveled 816 Kms from Aracaju while Ivory Coast traveled almost three times more (2370). While the African players were considered superior in strength and speed, Greece managed to be competitive all the way till the last minute and scored the winning goal that allowed them to go through to the stage of 16.

Source

My conclusion for this group was that team logistics played some role here too. Greece benefited from their base camp choice while Japan and Ivory Coast did not, in fact they probably were hindered. 

Other notable failures in this world cup were Italy and the USA team. USA traveled the most kms of all 32 teams (8886) while Italy was close with 8458 kms. 

Source

While I was never a fan of the German team, it’s only fair to close this blog post with their accomplishment in this last Mundial. They were the most prepared and organized team in this competition, not only from an athletic point of view but also for the team logistics. They picked a relatively north location in Bahia and arranged for a fit for purpose, newly built just for them, base camp. Campo Bahia  a new resort constructed at an area with a climate similar to those where the team’s matches were played, included 14 two-storey housing units, a training pitch, team headquarters, and a fitness center. It has been reported that a German investor has helped to fund the £25 million project. Germany was one of the top five teams with the less kms traveled (fourth with just 2114) at the Group stage. Interestingly Argentina that also made it to the World Cup final was third with just 2086 kms.

AITPM@IPENZ Day 3 - Freight, logistics and ... dogs.

Day three of the IPENZ Transportation award and as always with the conferences, people start to feel a bit tired and thinking of all the work that they have left behind.

Luckily there were a few interesting presentations starting with Geoff Dangerfield, CEO of NZ Transport Agency. Geoff presented the work that NZTA is doing to provide for transport solutions for today and tomorrow. He presented the “one network” thinking behind all NZTA actions and focused specifically on freight, where he described the agency’s goal for more freight on fewer trucks.

 

 

Of course he presented the already famous TV road safety ad, part of the wider Safer Journeys strategy.

 

One of the conference streams this morning was dedicated to the Signals NZ user group. The group has recently extended their activities to cover Intelligent Transport Systems to enhance people and freight movement through traffic control and ITS. An interesting fact from the presenters was that in New Zealand enforcement of red light cameras in not yet legal.

The organising committee has set aside some time in the program for delegates to have the chance to go through the “Active Poster Display”. Authors stood beside their posters and gave everyone the opportunity to ask questions and clarify things.

 

Another distinct stream of the day was the presentations of the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport a worldwide professional body with presence in more than 100 countries.

 

Finally the day closed with another fairly unique feature, the roundtable presentations. Seven different presentations were set up around tables and repeated three times with a duration of 25 minutes each. That gave the presenters the opportunity to have a true interaction with everyone witch worked quite well for most of them.

 

 

In the case of Jo Draper from NZ Transport Authority was a huge success, where she and her colleague Dean Ingoe from Auckland Transport presented the challenges behind stakeholder consultation on transport projects land acquisition and engaged us in a role playing game that helped everyone understand all the critical factors. As Jo said “when you visit people at their houses, beware, there is always a dog”